交出你的槍
歷 史 告 訴 我 們 ， 任 何 一 個 獨 裁 者 均 希 望 將 平 民 的 所 有 武 器 沒 收 ， 以 便 進 行 他 們 的 獨 裁 統 治 ， 如 右 翼 的 納 粹 獨 裁 者 希 特 拉 ， 他 沒 收 及 禁 止 人 民 購 買 槍 械 ， 因 為 如 要 建 立 獨 裁 統 治 ， 人 民 的 槍 械 將 會 是 重 大 障 礙 。
英 國 人 曾 飽 受 君 主 獨 裁 的 壓 迫 ， 因 此 ， 美 國 建 國 之 時 ， 憲 法 賦 予 人 民 擁 有 槍 械 的 自 由 ， 以 阻 止 美 國 出 現 獨 裁 統 治 。 現 在 ， 歷 史 上 最 龐 大 的 獨 裁 勢 力 - 世 界 新 秩 序 (New World Order) - 要 統 治 全 球 ， 牠 們 現 在 正 積 極 以 各 種 邪 術 及 荒 謬 的 研 究 沒 收 人 民 的 槍 械 。
邪 術
美 國 近 年 發 生 大 量 槍 擊 事 件 ， The Cutting Edge 的 研 究 指 出 ， 這 些 槍 擊 事 件 都 有 同 一 模 式 ， 這 些 槍 手 大 多 是 撒 旦 教 或 其 他 邪 教 的 信 徒 ， 而 Illuminati 及 美 國 政 府 的 獨 裁 頭 子 施 行 邪 術 ， 或 用 HAARP (另 參 考 U.S. Top Secret) 這 些 Mind Control - 思 想 控 制 的 科 技 去 驅 使 人 到 處 進 行 槍 殺 ， 製 造 這 些 事 件 的 目 的 都 只 是 要 製 造 借 口 去 實 行 槍 械 管 制!
荒 謬 的 研 究
然 而 ， 美 國 政 府 聲 稱 槍 械 管 制 可 控 制 槍 擊 案 的 發 生 ， 但 事 實 卻 不 然 ， 澳 洲 實 施 槍 械 管 制 以 來 罪 案 反 而 急 升 。 而 事 實 是 ， 准 許 人 民 擁 有 槍 械 可 使 罪 案 率 下 降!
另 外 ， 美 國 政 府 亦 大 力 倡 議 停 止 死 刑 的 執 行 ， 因 為 他 們 相 信 殺 人 犯 出 獄 後 將 會 繼 續 殺 人 ， 亦 為 他 們 製 造 借 口 沒 收 槍 械 。
總 括 而 言 ， 美 國 政 府 及 New World Order 正 做 盡 一 切 要 沒 收 所 有 人 的 槍 械 ， 方 便 他 們 的 獨 裁 統 治 及 對 基 督 徒 的 大 迫 害 ， 為 什 麼 ？ 牠 們 是 拜 撒 旦 的 ， Clinton 這 個 總 統 真 太 邪 。 撒 旦 對 基 督 徒 的 末 世 大 迫 害 己 迫 在 眉 睫 ， 閣 下 有 什 麼 打 算 呢 ？ 預 備 為 主 面 對 災 難 ， 還 是 認 為 ， 「不 會 的 ， 我 會 在 這 一 切 迫 害 之 前 被 提!」， 初 期 教 會 受 逼 迫 甚 烈 ， 我 們 不 會 有 什 麼 特 權 免 受 逼 迫 ， 怎 樣 選 擇 ， 完 全 是 閣 下 自 由 意 志 的 決 定 。
Source : The Cutting Edge
AUSTRALIA: The Results Are In
The following is a synopsis of an interview conducted by Ginny Simone with Keith Tidswell of Australia's Sporting Shooters Association. It is interesting to see the correlation regarding the principles of G-d's word being verified by hard facts.
One year after gun-owners were forced to
surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed, including semi-automatic .22 rifles
and shotguns, a program costing the government over 500 million dollars, the results are
in...
A dramatic increase in criminal activity has been experienced. Gun control
advocates respond "Just wait... we'll be safer... you'll see...".
OBSERVABLE FACT, AFTER 12 MONTHS OF DATA:
* Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2%
* Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6%
* Australia-wide, armed-robberies are up 44% (yes, FORTY-FOUR PERCENT)
* In the state of Victoria, homicides-with-firearms are up 300%
* Figures over the previous 25 years show a steady decrease in homicides-with-firearms
(changed dramatically in the past 12 months)
* Figures over the previous 25 years show a steady decrease in armed-robbery-with-firearms
(changed dramatically in the past 12 months)
* There has been a dramatic increase in breakins-and-assaults-of-the-elderly
* At the time of the ban, the Prime Minister said "self-defense is not a reason for
owning a firearm"
* From 1910 to present, homicides in Australia had averaged about 1.8-per-100,000 or
lower, a safe society by any standard.
* The membership of the Australian Sports Shooting Association has risen to 112,000, a
200% increase, in response to the ban and as an attempt to organize against further
controls, which are expected.
* Australian politicians are on the spot and at a loss to explain how no improvement in
"safety" has been observed after such monumental effort and expense was
successfully expended in "ridding society of guns". Their response has been to
"wait longer".
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the
right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
Our forefathers had lived a lifetime fighting the oppression of the British monarchy.
Furthermore, they were all very familiar with the history of British repression in the
previous 200 years. As they considered a way in which to guarantee future Americans their
continued freedoms, they felt they could pass no better Constitutional guarantee than the
Right To Bear Arms . They felt that, if Americans could own guns and own as many guns as
they desired, this collective gun ownership would be a huge stumbling block in the path of
any leader desiring to set up a dictatorship.
Therefore, they carefully constructed the clearest, most unambiguous statement possible in
the English language. In phrase #1, they stated the reason for this amendment: "A
well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state". This
militia mentioned here is not the standing army of the Federal Government, but a National
Guard type of informal militia. The Founders of the United States strongly believed that
the common citizen needed to be able to own and to bear arms in his own defense. The
second phrase naturally follows the logic of the first: "the right of the people to
keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
No fancy arguments, or any legalese, can hide the plain intent of our Founding Fathers in
owning weapons. Notice that our Founding Fathers used the word, "infringed"
here. This is an interesting choice of words, because it is far more limiting than the
word, 'outlawed'. Not only is the Federal Government forbidden to outlaw the ownership of
guns, they cannot even pass laws that "infringe" upon this right! In this
regard, the laws requiring potential owners to register their guns, and to pass any laws
requiring a background check before being able to buy a gun, are probably illegal. In
fact, all these laws requiring registration are intended to do is to inform the Federal
Government which of the law-abiding citizens own guns, so they will know which houses to
target during the planned take-over of all guns.
Thus, ever since World War I, the judges being approved have been well trained in the
movement toward the New World Order, so that they would overlook such Constitutional
obstacles. Thus the power of the Judicial Branch of government is thrown behind the global
government. Today, the anti-gun lobby is more entrenched and more organized than ever
before. They also have the most political power and propaganda expertise of any previous
anti-gun movement in this century.
As we begin our study, be aware that every single dictatorship in the history of the world
disarmed the common people. Further, such dictatorships forbade the creation of a common
citizen's militia, realizing such a para-military force could be a formidable fighting
force that could prevent severe repression. Since the advent of modern weaponry, Twentieth
Century dictators have seized all guns and have forbade the purchase of new guns. Whether
you are talking about the Leftist Communist dictatorships, or the Right-wing Nazi
dictatorship of Adolf Hitler, these tyrants seized guns and forbade the purchase of new
ones.
Dictators know they cannot survive a well-armed citizenry . The New World Order will be
history's most repressive dictatorship; they know they cannot even get it established if
the people own guns, and they know they cannot carry out their most severe plans of
population control and elimination if people own guns. For the longest time, I felt that
the modern weaponry of today rendered this Second Amendment obsolete. I no longer feel
this way. Now, I realize that even a well-armed modern military force faces an almost
impossible task of uprooting several tens of millions of patriots armed with over one
hundred million weapons. Such a task would mean fighting house to house, door to door, and
would result in the casualties of too many millions of soldiers of the New World Order
United Nations forces.
Therefore, the assault on weapon ownership must take place on a more indirect and subtle
level. Individual Americans must be brought to the point where they want guns taken from
fellow American citizens. If the majority of Americans could be brought to the point where
they would demand their fellow Americans turn over their weapons to authorities, that
would be much better. Today, we see just such a fight.
First, we shall talk about the direct assault on the ownership of weapons and secondly, we
shall talk about the indirect propaganda battle being waged for the hearts and minds of
the majority of Americans who do not own any guns.
DIRECT ASSAULT ON GUN OWNERSHIP
NEWS BRIEF: "Courting Trouble? As Lawsuits Loom, Gun Industry Threat Finds Makers,
Sellers Are Split On Issues and Tactics", by Paul M. Barrett, Staff Writer, The Wall
Street Journal, Wednesday, December 9, 1998, p. A1.
"As the gun industry faces an extraordinary legal attack by cities around the
country, recent history suggests that it might be time to circle the wagons. Threatened
with a similar volley of lawsuits by states, tobacco companies for the most part banded
together. Instead, the makers and sellers of firearms are in danger of splintering over a
host of issues -- including the basic question of legal strategy."
"The direction gun companies choose over the coming months could affect the outcome
of the new wave of litigation, which began in late October, when New Orleans became the
first city to sue the industry, seeking millions of dollars to cover the public cost of
responding to shootings. If, as expected, dozens of mayors join the battle, the strain and
cost of litigation could cripple smaller companies."
From the beginning of the battle over tobacco, I felt that the cities and states that were
suing the entire Tobacco Industry were really on shaky ground. Statistics abound which
demonstrate conclusively that about 80% of the total cost of medical care in a person's
life occurs in the last few years of their life. Therefore, an addiction to smoking, which
kills people about a decade earlier than they would otherwise have died, is really saving
the states an enormous sum of money! Indeed, tobacco companies won case after case after
case in the 1980's by employing this argument. Remember, also, that cigarettes are, and
have always been, a legal substance! We are not talking about illegal drugs here; we are
talking about legal cigarettes, pipes, and cigars.
However, beginning in 1993, judges began to rule that such an argument could not even be
presented to a jury, even though it was absolutely true. Thus hobbled, the tobacco
industry began to lose cases, and quickly came to terms with their accusers, in order to
prevent tens of thousands of individual lawsuits that would bankrupt them. This tactic by
the judges came at a time in American history when it had become fashionable to avoid the
consequences of one's acts. Therefore, loved ones of the smokers who had died gruesome
deaths could feel justified in turning around and blaming Corporate Tobacco. Such people
could easily overlook the standard, bold warning that has been printed on each package of
cigarettes for several decades, and they could overlook the fact that their loved one had
ignored the many warnings of various U.S. Surgeon Generals that cigarettes cause cancer of
many forms and kills prematurely.
However, now that the Tobacco Industry has been forced to come to terms with their unjust
accusers, I am not surprised to see that the advocates of Gun Control are already
announcing plans to come after the Gun Industry with the same tactic of lawsuits. Since it
takes such great amounts of money to fight lawsuits, even when you win the case, the Gun
Industry might find itself being bankrupted by the battle.
I wonder now if the Tobacco battle using lawsuits as the weapon of choice might have been
just the necessary first stage in the Plan to take our guns away. At first, you might
think it too odd that the road to Gun Control might have deliberately been routed through
Tobacco lawsuits; however, when you really think about it, you can see that such a battle
against an undeniably unpopular industry as Tobacco has set the precedents necessary to
battle the Gun Industry using the same proven tactic. Certainly, the Gun Industry is not
as well-heeled as the Tobacco Industry. They do not generate the amount of annual sales or
profits. This legal tactic might work in driving American gun manufacturers out of
business.
Now, let us talk about the Propaganda War being waged against the Gun Control Industry. As
with most propaganda, the anti-Gun propaganda is full of double-speak, outright lies, and
many distortions of the truth. For this part of our article, we turn once again to The
Wall Street Journal.
INDIRECT ASSAULT ON GUN OWNERSHIP -- THE HUGE BOLD LIE
NEWS BRIEF: "Gun Control Advocates Purvey Deadly Myths", by John R. Lott, Jr.,
The Wall Street Journal, Wednesday, November 11, 1998, page A22 Editorial.
"Gun control became a defining issue in several of last week's elections. Those
candidates opposing new regulations were painted as uncaring thugs indifferent to people's
deaths. Meanwhile, New Orleans Mayor Marc Morial last month filed suit against 15 gun
makers, demanding that they reimburse the city and pay punitive damages for all the city's
health care expenses and police salaries that arise from gun violence. Other cities seem
certain to follow, and that is only part of the litigation threatening to engulf gun
makers. To these plaintiffs, the solution to crime is simple and obvious: eliminate
guns."
"America may be obsessed with guns, but much of what passes as fact simply isn't
true. The news media focuses on tragic outcomes, while ignoring tragic events that were
avoided. Rarely do we hear about the more than two million [2,000,000] times each year
that people use guns defensively -- including cases in which public shootings are stopped
before they happen . Dramatic stories of mothers using guns to prevent their children from
being kidnapped by car-jackers seldom even make the local news."
The opposite side of tragic outcome cases are not explored seriously by the Liberal Mass
Media, either. Several years ago, a deranged man stepped to the front of one of the cars
of the Long Island Railroad commuter train and began shooting people inside the car,
killing several and wounding many others before he shot and killed himself. Gun Control
advocates had a field day, screaming to the world that gun control laws would have
prevented this maniac from killing these people. Millions of Americans, many of them
women, reacted emotionally to this charge, and agreed that gun control laws needed to be
strengthened. No one in the Media ever seriously addressed the issue that, just maybe, the
one thing that might have prevented this tragedy from occurring, or from killing as many
people as it did, might have been if some passenger in that car had possessed a weapon of
his own. That person then could have taken cover, pulled his or her weapon out, and
returned the fire of the maniac. This is the logical side of the argument on which this
writer of The Wall Street Journal chooses to land. We are indebted for him taking this
correct angle of argument! Listen to Lott continue his expose'. [In this section, any
highlighting of text is from the Cutting Edge].
"Myths about guns can threaten people's safety, by frightening them and preventing
them from using the most effective means to defend themselves. Here are five of the most
prevalent myths :
1. "When one is attacked, passive behavior is the safest approach. The Department of
Justice's National Crime Victimization Survey reports that the probability of serious
injury from an attack is 2.5 times greater for women offering no resistance than for women
resisting with a gun. Men also benefit from using a gun, but the benefits are smaller:
Offering no resistance is 1.4 times more likely to result in serious injury than resisting
with a gun. Resistance with a gun is the safest course of action for victims to
take."
2. "Friends or relatives are the most likely killers. This myth is usually based on
two claims: that 53% of murder victims are killed either by relatives or acquaintances and
that anyone could be a murderer. With the broad definition of 'acquaintances' used in the
FBI's Uniform Crime Reports, most victims are indeed classified as knowing their killer.
But what's not made clear is that 'acquaintance murder' primarily includes drug buyers
killing pushers, cabdrivers killed by first-time customers, gang members killing other
gang members, prostitutes killed by their clients, and so on. Only one U.S. city, Chicago,
reports a precise breakdown on the nature of 'acquaintance killings', and the statistic
gives a very different impression: between 1990-1995, just 17% of murder victims were
either family members, friends, neighbors, or roommates of their killers."
This deliberate misrepresentation [bald-face lying] on the part of the FBI really ticks me
off! This kind of lying in order to deceive the people is part and parcel of the campaign
to enslave us all in the coming global government. Further, we can see the FBI for the
kind of organization it has become; rather than being an independently run department of
the Executive Branch, fearlessly seeking the truth and protecting the American people, it
has become the willing slave of the Clinton Administration, lying and deceiving right
along with the President. In fact, former FBI Agent, Gary Aldrich, complained that, under
the Clinton Administration, the FBI had become simply a servant of the White House! Once
Clinton had accomplished this goal, he was then able to order the FBI Director to
illegally turn over those 900+ personal files to him, wantonly trampling on both the law
and the rights of all Americans! Remember, former White House Cabinet member, Chuck
Colson, went to jail for possessing just one such FBI file. In this instance, above, the
FBI is cooperating with the White House and other Gun Control Advocates, creating
statistics that will lie for the purpose of deceiving Americans into supporting Gun
Control.
Now that I have got that off my chest, let us finish John Lott's commentary on this point,
above. "Murderers are also not average citizens. About 90% of adult murderers already
have an adult criminal record. Murderers are overwhelmingly young males with low IQ's who
have long histories of difficulty getting along with others."
BIBLICAL DEMANDS FOR THE DEATH PENALTY
At this point, I wish to inform all people, including many immature, fuzzy-thinking
Christians, who oppose the Death Penalty, that they are unwittingly playing right into the
hands of those who would like to confiscate all our guns, and take away our liberties. You
see, the New World Order Plan recognizes that the main deterrent value of the Death
Penalty is that it permanently removes from society those criminals who would kill again,
and again, and again.
If Americans can be convinced to abolish the Death Penalty, so hardened criminals can get
out to kill again, the government propagandist can then use his propaganda machine,
convincing us that the problem is gun ownership; then the government for which he works
can set the stage for the ultimate confiscation of all guns. Your planned dictatorship can
go forward!
Furthermore, remember that God stipulated the Death Penalty, for the express purpose of
removing the evil from society . In fact, God is much tougher than most Americans realize,
as this quick study, below, will demonstrate.
Crimes for which God decreed the DEATH penalty:
* Incest.-- Lev. 18:6-16.
* Sexual relations with an in-law. -- Lev. 18:12-16.
* Sexual relations with a neighbor's wife. -- Lev. 18:20.
* Sacrificing children in a religious ceremony. -- Lev. 18:21.
* Homosexuality. --Lev. 18:22; 20:13.
* Bestiality. -- Lev. 18:23; 20:15-16.
* Cursing father and mother. -- Exodus 20:17; Lev. 18:9.
* Anyone who is a medium and has a familiar spirit, or is a wizard. -- Lev. 20:27.
* Murder. -- Exodus 21:12.
* Anyone who kidnaps another person. -- Exodus 20:16.
We present these Scriptures so you may comprehend how God views the Death Penalty and how
He plans on punishing for these sins. Interestingly, most Americans today would not view
any of these sins as being serious enough to warrant the death penalty. All Christians who
are opposing the Death Penalty on the supposed basis that it is not Christian need only to
remember that Jesus Christ never did remove the Moral Code of the Old Testament. In fact,
He upheld it, saying, "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets:
I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth
pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be
fulfilled." [Matthew 5:17-18] Christians who are currently opposing the Death Penalty
need to further understand that they are playing directly into the hands of the New World
Order Plan, in addition to fighting God!
Now, let us return to the Five Deadly Myths about Guns editorial in The Wall Street
Journal:
3. "The U.S. has a high murder rate because Americans own so many guns . There is no
international evidence backing this up. The Swiss, New Zealanders and Finns all own guns
as frequently as Americans, yet in 1995 Switzerland had a murder rate 40% lower than
Germany's and New Zealand had one lower than Australia's. Finland and Sweden have very
different gun ownership rates but very similar murder rates. Israel, with a higher gun
ownership rate than the U.S., has a murder rate 40% below Canada's. When one studies all
countries rather than just a select few, there is no relationship between gun ownership
and murder."
"U.S. data indicates that those states that have had the largest increases in gun
ownership have had the greatest drops in violent crime rates."
This statistic is the exact opposite of what our Government Propagandists have been
telling us for years! They have been lying to us all along, using deliberate
miscalculation techniques to produce reports that say what they want them to say.
4. "If law-abiding citizens are allowed to carry concealed handguns, people will end
up shooting each other after traffic accidents as well as accidentally shooting police
officers. Millions of people currently hold concealed handgun permits, and some states
have issued them for as long as 60 years. Yet only one permit holder has ever used a
concealed handgun after a traffic accident, and that case was ruled as self-defense. The
type of person willing to go through the permitting process is extremely law-abiding. In
Florida, almost 444,000 licenses were granted from 1987 to 1997, but only 84 people have
lost their licenses for any violations involving firearms. Most violations that lead to
permits being revoked involve accidentally carrying a gun into restricted areas, like
airports or schools. In Virginia, not a single permit holder has committed a violent
crime. Similar encouraging results have been reported in Kentucky, Nevada, North Carolina,
South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas, the only other states where information is
available."
Common sense should prevail here. If a criminal is sizing up a potential victim, he will
want one who is totally unarmed and who believes that resistance is futile and dangerous.
If the criminal believes his potential mark has a concealed handgun, he will look for
another victim. No criminal begins his dastardly deed with the expectation that he is
going to be killed! Therefore, states that allow their people to carry concealed handguns
have experienced the greatest drop in violent crime. Criminals just move to another state
whose laws against handguns make their marks more likely to be unarmed.
5. "The family gun is more likely to kill you or someone you know than to kill in
self-defense." The 1993 study yielding such numbers, published in the New England
Journal of Medicine, never actually inquired as to whose gun was used in the killing.
Instead, if a household owned a gun and if a person in that household or someone he knew
was shot to death while in the home, the gun in the household was blamed. In fact,
virtually all the killings in the study were committed by guns brought in by an intruder.
No more than 4% of the gun deaths in the study can be attributed to the homeowner's
gun."
"Also ignored is that 98% of the time when people use a gun defensively, merely
brandishing the weapon is sufficient to stop an attack. In less than 1% of the cases is a
gun even fired directly at the attacker. How many attacks have been deterred [stopped]
from ever occurring by the potential victims owning a gun? My own research finds that more
concealed handguns, and increased gun ownership generally, unambiguously deters murder,
robbery, and aggravated assaults. This is also in line with the well-known fact that
criminals prefer attacking victims they consider weak ."
Once again, we see a "prestigious" organization, the New England Journal of
Medicine, cooking the books, making up a deliberately flawed "study" that
produced the results for which they were looking! Liars figure ! Never before in our
history has it been so necessary to read statistics with great doubt and skepticism,
because never before in our history have so many organizations and government agencies
been operating with the same agenda. You simply cannot take most statistics at face value.
Truly, we are at the End of the Age, when our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, warned
against unparalleled deception. Listen:
* "Take heed that no man deceive you." [Matthew 24:4]
* "And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many." [Matthew 24:11]
Remember, now that the prophesied 10 super nations of Daniel and Revelation have been
established, through the efforts of President Clinton, we are faced with a government that
is dedicated to the appearance of the greatest false prophet of all.
* "For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall show great
signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very
elect." [Matthew 24:24] Three times, Jesus warned against unparalleled deception at
the End of the Age, simply to emphasize the historically unique depth and height of the
lying campaign that is going to be unleashed upon the people at the End of the Age. We are
in it, and we are being bombarded by so many lies on so many subjects, by the greatest
propaganda machine in history-- the Mass Media. Too many Americans are being deceived
greatly. Of course, we have been weakened by a "dumbed down" public educational
system that has refused to teach people to read well, think well, and to be discerning. It
is no wonder Karl Marx proclaimed, in his Communist Manifesto, that the public school
system was one of his best tools to convert a nation to Communism without a revolution!
This Wall Street Journal editorial finishes with a great paragraph, so let us allow him to
end our discussion.
"These are only some of the myths about guns and crime that drive the public policy
debate. We must not lose sight of the ultimate question: 'Does allowing citizens to own
guns, on net, save lives?' The evidence strongly indicates that it does ." [Mr. Lott
is a fellow at the University Law School. He is author of 'More Guns, Less Crime:
Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws', University of Chicago Press, 1998]."
A huge majority of law-abiding citizens had better understand quickly and thoroughly that
all this lying propaganda about guns being responsible for crime and deaths is coming from
a single source: the New World Order Plan. The ultimate objective is to eliminate our
freedoms, our private property ownership, and to subject us to the most repressive
dictatorship known in history. One of the huge obstacles standing in their way is gun
ownership, to the tune of over 100,000,000 guns. If we allow the government to take away
our guns, we will be signing our own death warrants.
The very fact that we see such an emphasis upon taking away guns, coupled with all the
other signs of fulfilled prophecy should convince even the greatest skeptic that the End
Times are upon us. The citizens of the United States of America are at the greatest threat
of losing our liberties than at any time in our nation's history; all it would take is one
sustained crisis, or the appearance of a charismatic leader on the world scene! Americans
are so weak now in discernment that they would cheer as this leader took away our
liberties! This is the Plan.
Are you spiritually ready? Is your family? Are you adequately protecting your loved ones?
This is the reason for this ministry, to enable you to first understand the peril facing
you, and then help you develop strategies to warn and protect your loved ones. Once you
have been thoroughly trained, you can also use your knowledge as a means to open the door
of discussion with an unsaved person. I have been able to use it many times, and have seen
people come to Jesus Christ as a result. These perilous times are also a time when we can
reach many souls for Jesus Christ, making an eternal difference.
If you have accepted Jesus Christ as your personal Savior, but have been very lukewarm in
your spiritual walk with Him, you need to immediately ask Him for forgiveness and for
renewal. He will instantly forgive you, and fill your heart with the joy of the Holy
Spirit. Then, you need to begin a daily walk of prayer and personal Bible Study.
If you have never accepted Jesus Christ as Savior, but have come to realize His reality
and the approaching End of the Age, and want to accept His FREE Gift of Eternal Life, you
can also do so now, in the privacy of your home. Once you accept Him as Savior, you are
spiritually Born Again, and are as assured of Heaven as if you were already there. Then,
you can rest assured that the Kingdom of Antichrist will not touch you spiritually.
If you would like to become Born Again, turn to our Salvation Page now.
We hope you have been blessed by this ministry, which seeks to educate and warn people, so
that they can see the coming New World Order -- Kingdom of Antichrist -- in their daily
news.